Adversary Emulation | Independent Security Testing

You've been told
you're secure

TigerNDR is the second opinion. A full authorized, non-destructive assessment of your network — the exposure a ransomware crew would reach, surfaced find-and-report by a seasoned operator and never exploited. You get a report your vendor can act on, then a retest that confirms the fixes held. Independent of whoever built it, sold it, or patched it.

The vendor who fixed it shouldn't be the one who grades it

You're a target.
And the only people who've tested you work for the people you pay.

Schools, local governments, churches, and small businesses are among the most targeted organizations in the country — large networks, thousands of endpoints, sensitive data, real regulatory weight, and budgets that cover all of it at once. Most have never had their defenses tested by someone who doesn't also sell them the fix. An assessment from the vendor who built your stack grades its own homework. A real ransomware crew won't be as polite.

1,600+
Publicly disclosed cyber incidents affecting U.S. school districts since 2016
827%
Increase in ransomware attacks against educational institutions, 2019–2023
$1.4M
Average recovery cost per incident — downtime, legal, remediation, credit monitoring
0
Independent adversary tests most organizations this size have had — until a real attacker runs the first one for free

Assess. Report. Retest.
One operator. One fixed price.

You authorize the scope in writing. From my own lab, I run a non-destructive, find-and-report assessment of your network — following the same path a ransomware crew would take, but surfacing and documenting the exposure rather than exploiting it. You get a plain-language report your team or your remediation vendor can act on immediately. Then I come back and run it again to confirm every door is closed.

1
Authorize
Signed rules of engagement define scope, targets, timing, and hard limits. Nothing is touched that isn't in writing.
Scope & written authorization
2
Emulate
I walk the intrusion path a ransomware operator would — external footholds, exposed services, and authorized phishing simulation for initial access.
Initial access & recon
3
Escalate
Inside the perimeter, I move laterally, hunt credentials and domain admin, and reach the data a real crew would hold for ransom.
Lateral movement & privilege escalation
4
Report
A prioritized, plain-language report: what I got into, how, what it would have cost you, and exactly what to fix first.
Findings & remediation guidance
5
Retest
After your team or vendor remediates, I attack the same paths again and verify, with evidence, that the holes are actually closed.
Verification retest — included

The same exposure a ransomware crew
would find first.

🌐
External Perimeter
Internet-facing services, VPNs, remote access, and exposed admin interfaces — the footholds attackers scan for before anyone picks up the phone.
Initial Access • T1190
🎣
Phishing & Social
Authorized, scoped phishing simulation against agreed targets to measure how a real crew would get the first click — and what they'd reach once they did.
Access • T1566
🔑
Identity & Active Directory
Credential hunting, Kerberos abuse, and the path to domain admin. The single most common road from one phished user to the entire network.
Privilege Escalation • T1078
↔
Lateral Movement
How far a foothold spreads — pivoting across segments, reusing credentials, and reaching systems that were supposed to be isolated.
Movement • T1021 / T1570
💾
Data & Ransom Targets
The PII, student records, and backups a crew would exfiltrate and encrypt. I prove reach — I never destroy, encrypt, or remove your data.
Impact • T1486 (simulated)
👁
Detection & Response
Did anything catch me? I document what your existing tools and team saw — and what sailed through silently — at each stage of the intrusion.
Blue-Team Reality Check

Every target, technique, and timing window is agreed in writing before anything runs. Out-of-scope systems stay untouched. Scope is yours to set — the list above is the menu, not the mandate.

A real assessment
with real guardrails.

Emulating an adversary is only useful if you can trust the person doing it. These are the non-negotiables on every engagement.

01
Authorized, always.
Nothing runs without signed authorization from someone with the authority to grant it. Scope, targets, and timing are agreed in writing before the engagement begins. No authorization, no test.
02
Scoped and non-destructive.
I prove access; I don't cause damage. Nothing is encrypted, deleted, or exfiltrated off your network, and there's no denial-of-service. Production stays up and your data stays yours.
03
One operator you can reach.
You know exactly who is on your network and when — a named operator, a defined window, and a number that answers if anything looks wrong. No offshore team, no mystery subcontractor.
04
Evidence over adjectives.
Every finding comes with proof — how I got in, what I reached, and the steps to reproduce it. No vague "you might be vulnerable," no scanner dump dressed up as a report.
05
Honest reporting.
I report what I found and what I didn't. A clean result is reported as clean; a retest passes only with evidence. I don't inflate findings to justify the invoice, and I never grade my own retest on faith.

Independence is the whole product. I don't sell you the fix, and I disclose any referral relationship up front — so the only thing I'm selling is the truth about your network.

A report you can act on.
A retest that proves you did.

Not a 300-page scanner dump. A findings report written for the people who have to fix things — and the follow-up that confirms they worked.

The Findings Report

  • Executive summary leadership can read
  • Each finding ranked by real-world risk
  • Exactly how I got in, with evidence
  • Steps to reproduce every finding
  • Prioritized, plain-language fix list
  • What your existing tools did and didn't catch

The Verification Retest

  • Included in the engagement price
  • Run after your team or vendor remediates
  • Same attack paths, re-attempted
  • Pass or fail, with evidence either way
  • A clean closing letter for your records
  • Proof for your board, auditor, or insurer

Mapped to Standards

  • Every technique mapped to MITRE ATT&CK
  • Findings tied to NIST CSF 2.0 functions
  • Language that fits FERPA / HIPAA reviews
  • Supports cyber-insurance questionnaires
  • Reusable in your security audit evidence
  • Written for the compliance reviews you already answer

Operating Under Anthropic's Cybersecurity Verification Program

My tooling is developed with Claude under Anthropic's Cybersecurity Verification Program (CVP) — a vetting process that authorizes approved operators for legitimate dual-use security work while keeping prohibited uses blocked. It verifies the context of the work: authorized, defensive adversary emulation, performed with permission.

Flat and published.
Retest included. No retainers.

What Testing Usually Costs
National pentest firm, per engagement$15,000 – $50,000+
Retest (if offered at all)Billed separately
Managed red-team retainer$100,000+/yr
Average ransomware recovery$1,400,000
TigerNDR Engagement
Scoped weekend engagementFlat, fixed price
Verification retestIncluded
Recurring / retainer cost$0
Sized forA single purchase order
Priced per engagement, not per seatQuoted up front

Every engagement is quoted as one flat figure before work begins — the test and the retest together, no hourly surprises and no annual lock-in. Pricing is set to fit a typical purchase order so your team can buy it the way they buy everything else.

1
Weekend to Run It
1
Named Operator
2x
Passes — Test & Retest
0
Recurring Fees
GA
Public Sector Focus
100%
Independent of Your Vendors

Lean teams, public and private —
tested like the adversary means it

School districts

Thousands of student and staff accounts, open-by-design networks, and PII under FERPA. The most-targeted public sector in the country — and the least often tested by someone independent.

Cities & counties

Utilities, public safety, finance, and records systems on networks that grew by accretion. Find out what a ransomware crew would reach before they show you for free.

Agencies & authorities

Water, transit, libraries, health districts — lean IT, strict obligations, and a board that needs independent assurance, not a vendor grading its own work.

Anyone who just got "fixed"

Had a breach, an audit finding, or a remediation project wrap up? That's exactly when a second opinion matters most. I test whether the fix actually held.

There are two kinds of organizations: those that have been hit, and those that haven't been hit yet. The only question that matters is whether someone friendly finds the open door first — on a weekend, with a report — or someone who leaves a ransom note. I'm the friendly one.
Why TigerNDR exists

Book an engagement

Your information is used only to respond to your inquiry. We don't sell, share, or pass it to third parties — privacy by architecture, same as the platform.

Let's talk

Tell me about your network and what prompted the interest — a board ask, an audit finding, a vendor you'd like checked, or just the sense that no one independent has ever tested you. I'll follow up to scope it and quote a flat price.

Weekend and after-hours engagements across Georgia. I typically respond within 24 hours.